David Dixon at the Tom Dent Congo Square Symposium

“I am astounded by the progress that you have all made in New Orleans in having a city where you actually believe in your city. You may be mad at your mayor or mad at each other or your councilor, but you assume that if you make policies and rules and solve problems like this you’ll be able to do something about it and that’s a huge step forward.”
-Goody Clancy’s David Dixon, principal in charge of planning and urban design

On April 4, Mr. Dixon joined 5 other speakers at the Tom Dent Congo Square Symposium in New Orleans to talk to folks about the shifting demographic trends that will result in a bright future for New Orleans, and a complex future for some of its neighborhoods.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Wichita wastes no time in implementing its 2011 downtown plan

Downtown Wichita is active! Barely 18 months after adopting a downtown master plan – created by Goody Clancy and a team of economic and transportation experts – developers, designers, new residents, growing businesses, and city staff have already achieved impressive results. Goody Clancy principal David Dixon and I recently had a chance to visit Wichita, see its progress, and meet with some of the entrepreneurs, leaders and students making further investments in their downtown.

Nearly $300 million has been invested in a variety of private development and public infrastructure projects influenced by the planning process. Nearly $100 million more was invested in 2012, and another $112 million in projects was being planned or already under construction when we visited. Downtown has added and filled 300 new housing units per year – twice the rate forecast for the plan by Laurie Volk, known nationally for her expertise in defining emerging urban housing markets. 40 businesses came to downtown in 2012, while the YMCA, Kansas Leadership Foundation and a major church built highly visible new facilities. A 14-story office building — beautiful in its 1920s heyday but decades past its prime as office space — has re-emerged as a handsome boutique hotel. Another hotel, the venerable Broadview, got a thorough renovation and added a new conference facility and outdoor terrace overlooking the Arkansas River.
 

I was particularly struck by how three powerful factors have driven downtown Wichita’s achievements: partnerships, demand for downtown housing, and quality design.

Partnerships
“Block 1” exemplifies the opportunity that comes from people working in partnership. For years prior to the downtown planning process, this prominent block stagnated for due to weak market demand, lack of parking, and animosity between two property owners. It contained that 1920s office building I mentioned above, as well as the city’s former flagship department store, also long shuttered. Our plan suggested reviving both buildings with housing or hotel uses that could take advantage of their smaller floor sizes, and providing parking that both buildings could share in a new public garage screened from pedestrian view. It also suggested that the Wichita Downtown Development Corporation (WDDC) — a champion of downtown supported by major property owners and businesses — encourage cooperation among property owners and the City on efforts of mutual interest. In a remarkably short time, people in Wichita transformed the situation on the block following just these strategies.

The WDDC brought new-generation property owners together with the City and the Kansas Leadership Foundation – which had been looking to move its headquarters and conference center, also on the block, someplace else with better parking – to forge a plan benefiting all players. The City’s commitment to building a parking structure enabled the foundation to rebuild bigger and better on-site, while providing enough capacity to attract new uses to the vacant historic buildings. The City also collaborated with the other site owners to transform a midblock alley into a pedestrian-friendly walkway and small plaza, complete with mosaic murals, that neatly pulls loading activity to the block’s interior, eliminating disruption on the sidewalks (since improving pedestrian conditions across downtown was a key goal of the final plan). All stakeholders worked together to brand the new mix of uses as “Block 1” in signage and marketing. The former department store and new ground-floor storefronts in the garage still await tenants, but whether office, housing or retail, these uses will complement the hotel and conference center by adding activity at different times of the day and week, and by making more efficient use of the block’s shared parking.
 

The Finn Lofts are just one of the many projects completed since approval of the downtown Plan in 2010.

The Finn Lofts are just one of the many projects completed since approval of the downtown Plan in 2010.

Housing Demand
Laurie Volk’s housing market analysis – which showed potential for 1,500 additional housing units over 10 years – identified housing as the most important engine of investment in downtown. For a community firmly committed to the power and principle of entrepreneurial initiative, this solid indication of market opportunity proved a cornerstone for the plan. In the three years since we reported her findings publicly, the market has borne out Laurie’s conservative projections…and then some. Dave Burke, an architect and developer whose pioneering work has shown downtown as a great place to live, rented nearly all 36 lofts in a restored player piano factory within five weeks of putting them on the market. This follows successful rent-up of nearly 90 units in a converted school that took place during the downtown planning process. Other developers have joined him in creating hundreds more units in renovated buildings. Michael Ramsey and El Dorado architects have borught a modern design sensibility and creative unit types to their renovations. Fresh from creating new units in Wichita’s funky Commerce Street Arts District, they have begun conversion of an art deco office building to a residential building designed for singles and couples with young children as well as older singles and couples. The building will boast a play terrace for kids overlooked by a higher-level terrace for adults, and a lobby that features both a coffee bar and a daycare center.
 

These projects share a common approach of transforming a considerable stock of obsolete office, institutional and industrial buildings into housing utilizing historic tax credits as a key funding mechanism. The Garvey Center, a mixed-use development that helped kick off downtown’s residential revival ten years ago by transforming a Holiday Inn into apartments, will soon break new ground on downtown’s first newly built housing in decades. Taking advantage of cost efficiencies created by sharing parking with adjacent office buildings, its 36 units will anchor a downtown neighborhood oriented to the Arkansas River’s extensive greenway and the city’s museum district.
 

High-quality design
Finally, excellent design – in architecture, landscape, and urbanism – has proved its value. Most striking is the YMCA’s new facility at a prominent gateway to downtown. Architects Schaeffer Johnson showcase the building’s basketball court and pool behind broad windows along two major streets. This design move has a double payoff: the display of diverse people engaged in intense activity, day and night, celebrates the Y’s mission of building community and health, and its light and high visibility makes streets safe and inviting for walking, underscoring downtown’s vitality. Several housing developments combine sensitive historic restoration with bold new architecture that reinforces Wichita’s architectural heritage while infusing it with new currency. Redesigned streetscapes reinforce the sense of place in downtown’s multiple emerging neighborhoods. Brick paving, vintage street lights and interpretive signage chronicling an industrial past reinterpret St. Francis Street as a place of small businesses, loft housing and restaurants. Along Commerce Street, artists and residents rejected new utility poles in favor of keeping their old bent ones that reflect the street’s traditional industrial character. By the end of this year, new custom-designed bus shelters will help reinforce Douglas Avenue’s emerging role as an inviting and convenient place to catch transit. The WDDC has planted its development and design center in a Douglas Avenue storefront. The center helps suburban developers, now expressing interest in working downtown, translate the design conventions they know into urban formats that welcome pedestrians and the mix of activities unique to downtown.
 

The success of partnerships, the self-reinforcing housing market, and high-quality design owe owes much to two leaders of the downtown master planning process. Jeff Fluhr, president of the WDDC, channels his abundant energy and charisma into connecting developers, designers, property and business owners, community leaders and other stakeholders. He understands how those connection can catalyze the opportunities that come from collaboration. WDDC daily celebrates downtown’s successes while tackling the obstacles to fully realizing downtown’s potential — for example, recruiting retail tenants to pioneer locations and untangling complex land leases. Scott Knebel, Downtown Revitalization Manager for the City of Wichita, leads efforts to establish partnerships in which the City’s investment in public infrastructure unlocks new private investment. He coordinates the City’s downtown infrastructure, transit and management operations to make sure they work together smoothly and maximize opportunity for private investors to create valuable new places downtown.

Wichita’s downtown successes have stemmed in part from community leaders’ strong interest in studying other downtowns to learn what has worked for them. As Wichitans work together to apply these lessons, they have demonstrated best practices themselves and pioneered new approaches. The city and its private- and public-sector leaders have become an impressive model for residents looking to revive downtowns and urban neighborhoods in cities across the United States.

 

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Goody Clancy Wins Top National Planning Award

 


130109_Eblast_FOTY_v8

Click Here to Read More about the 2013 National Planning Award

 

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The ‘Easy’ Button for Going Solar at Home (part 2)

By Chad Perry, Planning and Urban Design Manager
In a post back in May I provided some background about the process and decision to go solar with my roughly 80-year-old single-family house. I promised more info “upon completion,” so here we go.

The panels went up over a couple of very hot days in July (sorry, roof guys), and after a few inspections and final sign-off by our utility we were authorized to flip the switch in August.

Are we glad we did it? Well, it didn’t cost us a penny…but I’ll let some graphics from our utility company and SunRun (at the moment only operating in 10 states) illustrate that answer a bit better.

This chart from National Grid makes it easy to see when we went active and how we (blue line) compare with our neighbors’ energy usage—not to mention what little use we’ll have for the utility’s product going forward.

SunRun’s customer site provides many options for monitoring impact and production. Here’s our impact for the first month or so.

In part 3, my two-year-old will explain via video the nuts and bolts of how solar work. Either that or why she prefers the curvy slide to the bumpy slide at the park…she’s a little unpredictable on tape.

Share
Posted in community and diversity, innovation neighborhoods, sustainable communities | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Eight Go-To Sources on Climate Change and Urban Resilience

By Steve Wolf, senior designer
The back-burner issue of resilience planning has rocketed to the top of political agendas in coastal cities around the US as a result of Superstorm Sandy. As we were putting together our post about the need to keep urban design at the center of that planning (below), we found ourselves, um, flooded with Web links and resources. We share the best of those here and plan to expand this list as we find more.

  • Rising sea levels in New York Bay proved a key ingredient in the huge storm surges that washed over all five boroughs during Sandy. We’ve seen no clearer introduction to the science behind sea level rise in New York and globally than this interview with NASA Goddard Institute climatologist Cynthia Rosenzweig, posted at NOAA’s Climate Portal. It manages to convey the gravity of the challenge New York faces in the next century without sensationalism—no small feat.
  • Architecture 2030 offers a wealth of information on the threat climate change poses to American cities and effective strategies for shrinking the carbon footprint of the built environment. Its unfussy interactive map feature shows the impact of higher sea levels on dozens of coastal communities.
  • One of the best overviews of climate-change impacts globally comes from a report released in 2007 by the OECD (the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). It ranks the 20 most-vulnerable cities in 2005 in terms of population and cost of potential damage from 1-in-100-year flooding (a standard that will soon require dramatic recalibration, as back-to-back Hurricanes Irene and Sandy showed in New York), and provides a comparable list for 2070.
  • The Urban Climate Change Research Network focuses on urban areas worldwide and released a useful comprehensive report on the topic in 2011.
  • The relatively young Consortium for Climate Risk in the Urban Northeast focuses on risk and adaptation for Boston, New York, and Philadelphia and will eventually broaden its scope to include smaller coastal cities from Massachusetts to Pennsylvania. It comprises researchers at UMass, Columbia, CCNY, Stevens, and Drexel—a happy coincidence for us, since we recently completed a 30-year master plan for the Drexel campus.
  • The post-storm chatter about protecting New York’s infrastructure turned reflexively to engineered solutions, from massive storm barriers to Texas-sized inflatable plugs that might have kept seven East River tunnels dry. Mainstream thinking, however, increasingly includes approaches that enlist natural processes in creating cheaper and lower-maintenance solutions. Next American City pulled together a good sampling of these “soft” proposals.
  • During our creation of the post-Katrina master plan for New Orleans, we had the good fortune to take part in the provocative Dutch Dialogues organized by Waggonner & Ball architects. The provocative series offers an excellent model for rethinking a city’s relationship with water and for reimagining water-control infrastructure as urban amenities—precisely what we mean when we argue that urban design must play a central role in resilience planning.
  • As for those engineered approaches, the reliable Yale Environment 360 features contributions from faculty and researchers at Yale’s School of Forestry and Environmental Studies. This post offers a thoughtful look at surge barriers, one of the “hard” solutions most commonly cited after the storm. It reviews how barriers could protect New York Bay and notes their increasing use in cities from Providence to St. Petersburg.
Share
Posted in Planning, sustainable communities | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

In Sandy’s Wake, More Resilience…and More Urban Design

by David Dixon, principal-in-charge of planning and urban design, and Steve Wolf, senior designer
Hurricane Sandy’s banal name belied its dramatic impacts. The morning after the storm’s passage we learned just how vulnerable large American cities have become to the impacts of climate change—and New York found itself, as usual, at the center of the action, with seven East River tunnels filled with water, Manhattan below 34th Street without electricity, and flooding in every borough.

“New weather patterns…and old infrastructure,” said New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, with uncharacteristic understatement, “are not a good combination.” He asserted, however, that a new generation of resilient infrastructure designed with rising seas and fiercer storms in mind offered New Yorkers a singular opportunity to “build this city back stronger and better.” His words should resonate around the globe; the assets at risk from coastal flooding in the ten most vulnerable cities worldwide equaled 5% of global GDP in 2005, according to the OECD. That proportion will nearly double over the next 60 years as cities grow and sea levels rise.

Although no scientist argued that climate change directly caused Sandy, climatologists almost universally agree that it amplified the storm and its impact (for instance here and in an excellent and accessible discussion here). Record-breaking water terperatures fed energy into the system, extra water in the atmosphere boosted rainfall, and above Greenland a “blocking front” linked to polar-ice loss forced the storm inland rather than allowing it to take a typical offshore course toward the North Atlantic. Crucially for New York, rising sea levels exacerbated storm damage. In the 20th century, New York harbor has risen nearly a foot, creeping gradually up the seawall built around lower Manhattan at the start of the 20th century. The outlook for the 21st century makes that increase look like chump change: By 2100, melting polar ice and thermal expansion will push the world’s oceans to a much higher new normal. The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) projects that sea levels will rise between 7 inches and 2.5 feet, but other models that factor in more significant melting of polar ice project rises of up to 6 feet. Additionally, New York sits in a sea-level “hot spot” running from North Carolina to Massachusetts where currents, water temperatures and other conditions could add as much as another foot to that total.

After Hurricane Katrina (our previous “once-in-a-lifetime” storm), New Orleans taught us that America lacks the financial resources and the political tools to relocate entire communities threatened by rising seas to safer ground. The reality of more and increasingly destructive storms like Sandy means that coastal communities will need to focus  on rising seas. Governor Cuomo’s call for “stronger and better” suggests that the billions of dollars communities will spend to protect themselves can, with smart planning, also enhance those communities. Protection from rising seas does not have to mean a  design driven by engineering.  Urban design that assures walkability, sense of place, human scale and delight will need to play a starring role in building resilience.

New York has already studied raised ventilation grates to block subway flooding, in the process reconceiving them as voluptuous street furniture. Solutions like this suggest how urban design can guide climate-change response, here delivering subway protection below ground and a more walkable environment above. In fact, a 2010 show at the Museum of Modern Art suggested a suite of imaginative (and more sweeping) physical interventions in the harbor that would both build the city physically and dampen the destructive power of storm-driven waves. (Also here.)

As noted, New York hardly stands alone. The OECD projects that by 2070, 150 million people in coastal cities—primarily Asian capitals like Calcutta, Shanghai, and Singapore—will regularly encounter what we now call 1-in-100-year flooding. (Several US cities besides New York show up on this list of global misfortune, including Miami, Virginia Beach, and New Orleans). Outside the US, cities have already begun to respond to climate change, building seawalls that become waterfront parks, the foundations for expanded financial districts, or found land for performing arts centers. The Netherlands has for decades pioneered ways of transforming water-control measures from potential infrastructure nightmare into valued community-building assets—creating barrier islands as beach resorts, inventing new ways to use water as an urban amenity, and looking to rising seas as a new source of energy.

As Americans and their elected officials reframe the discussion about resilience in the wake of Sandy, we will need to look at best practices around the globe for models. And the best ones have almost uniformly turned to good design and urban planning to turn their response to climate change into the building blocks of stronger, healthier, more appealing cities.

Share
Posted in sustainable communities, transit and walkable places, Uncategorized, What's New | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Planning Basics: Building in Walkability

by Phil Schaeffing, urban designer and planner

Among urban planners and the general public, “walkability” describes a key desired characteristic of existing neighborhoods and new development.  A growing body of research associates higher levels of daily physical activity with improved health outcomes. Since walking is the perfect way to integrate more activity into a daily routine, how can urban designers and planners make it a more attractive option for people?

A variety of factors contribute to an area’s walkability, including land use mix, distance to destinations, and pedestrian infrastructure like crosswalks and connected sidewalks. The quality of the physical environment also makes a significant difference in people’s willingness to walk and how enjoyable the experience is. Shade in summer, protection from biting winds in winter, a stimulating visual environment, and the presence of other pedestrians all help encourage people to walk. Planners can do their part by designing sidewalks that promote all these elements and by retrofitting existing sidewalks to incorporate them.

The example in the photo—which could be from almost any city in the US but is, in fact, Atlanta—offers no shade to provide relief from the summer sun, and the parking lots adjacent to the sidewalk create dead areas with nothing interesting to look at. Other pedestrians are a rarity at most times of the day because there is little reason to walk there.

How could this sidewalk be improved? The narrow width makes planting trees a challenge, but reconfiguring the roadway to eliminate a travel lane and replace it with a wider sidewalk and/or bike lane is one option. Another is to build bulb-outs into the on-street parking and plant trees in the resulting new space, increasing shade without obstructing the sidewalk. Encouraging infill development on existing parking lots would eliminate voids, increase visual interest, and provide more destinations for pedestrians. Such new development would need to hug the sidewalk, as the older buildings on the right do (although they could leave a few extra feet for swales or a small active space in front of a restaurant). As these incremental changes take place, more people will be drawn to the area, further increasing the attractiveness of walking.

Existing streets and sidewalks provide plenty of opportunities for this type of creative re-thinking of the public realm. Getting more people walking delivers many benefits: it increases physical activity and can foster a sense of community when pedestrians begin to see the same people every day. Encouraging walking can also act as an economic development tool, since walking is free and operating a car costs money that could be spent locally. Planners can play a key role in this process by advocating in their communities for more funds for these types of walkability enhancements that have multiple benefits.

Share
Posted in sustainable communities, transit and walkable places, What's New | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Update: Shared Spaces

by Steve Wolf, senior graphic designer

When I wrote last February about shared spaces I didn’t realize that they had an actual inventor, freethinking Dutch traffic engineer Hans Monderman. The always-useful Cap’n Transit Rides Again blog corrected that oversight in today’s post, which offers a succinct analysis of how not to design a shared space (or woonerf, as its intellectual father would have called it). The Captain’s analysis includes an insight that I dismissed in my February post but which actually cuts to the heart of why woonerven work. Discussing intersections in the New York borough of Queens, he notes that removing stoplights “calms traffic by replacing rules (follow the light) with negotiations (communicated through eye contact).” When drivers are forced into negotiations, they see pedestrians differently than they do when rules make it possible for them to operate without thinking about their surroundings. In essence, rules elevate driving above all other activities on the street—even though planning and even political thinking have moved well beyond that habit of mind.

Massachusetts, in fact, has experienced the benefit of favoring negotiation over rules, thanks to a spate of signs in crosswalks (and I mean literally in crosswalks, on stanchions) pointing out that state law requires motorists to yield to pedestrians in a crosswalk. That law isn’t new, but the signs are, and my own experience suggests that they’ve made motorists a lot more aware, if not completely respectful, of pedestrians. (NB: The link to the Wilson Quarterly article on Hans Monderman comes via the Cap’n Transit post.)

Share
Posted in getting density right, transit and walkable places | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hall of Fame Award from Residential Architect magazine

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Building a Better Campus for Drexel

by Kat Maines

A recent column by Inga Saffron, architecture critic for the Phildalphia Inquirer, highlights the improvements already under way since adoption early this year of our master plan for the Drexel University campus. Saffron credits the bottom-up planning process we conducted for the relatively limited push-back from surrounding neighborhoods over a plan that considerably increases the density of the campus. Our Planning and Urban Design group typically works to engage all components of the community in developing a plan. In this case, we focused not only on improving areas around the campus for all stakeholders but on meeting the university’s goal of fully embracing its urban setting — something it had avoided for many decades. The review highlights projects such as new dorms and small infill buildings that create a more urban and interesting streetscape designed to engage pedestrians fully in the spaces around them. Architectural Record reprinted Saffron’s review on its blog, which added a satisfying (if implicit) stamp of approval. CLICK HERE to read the article and HERE to see the slideshow.

Share
Posted in community and diversity, getting density right, innovation neighborhoods, transit and walkable places, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment